1.Aleinikova, O. et al. 2020. Project management technologies in public administration. J. Management Information and Decision Sciences, 23(5): 564-576.

2.Arivazhagan, D. et al. 2023. An Assessment of Challenges of Digitalization of Agrarian Sector. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 621 LNNS, 48–57.

3.Avedyan, L. et al. 2023. The effectiveness of the development of territories in the state regional system politicians. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51): 333–344.

4.Bazaluk, O. et al. 2023. Determining the Safe Distance for Mining Equipment Operation When Forming an Internal Dump in a Deep Open Pit (2023) Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7). art. no. 5912.

5.Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. and Verhoest, K. 2010. The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations: Shifting Patterns of Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

6.Cangiano, M., Curristine, T. and Lazare, M. 2013. Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture. International Monetary Fund.

7.Chaliuk, Y. et al. 2021a. The Potential of Digitalisation and Social Dialogue in Ensuring Post-Pandemic Labour Market Sustainability: Priorities for Ukraine. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 13(2): 70-85.

8.Chaliuk, Y. et al. 2021b. Implementing of the COM-B Model in In-Service Training of Civil Servants as a Prerequisite for Effective Public Governance. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3): 224-235.

9.Chaliuk, Y. et al. 2023. Modeling the Application of Anti-Crisis Management Business Introduction for the Engineering Sector of the Economy. Int. J. Safety & Security Engineering, 13(2): 187-194.

10.Deyneha, I. et al. 2016. Regional features of marketing mix formation in rural green tourism. Actual Prob. of Econ., 9(183): 184-194.

11.Dias, T.L. et al. 2023. Project manager competencies associated with the projects’ success in the public sector. Revista De Gestão E Projetos, 14(2): 31-54.

12.Driessnack, J. 2015. Using PMI Standards Framework to Improve U.S. Federal Government Capital Investment Outcomes. PMI White Paper.

13.Emerson, K. and Nabatchi, T. 2015. Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

14.Gaievska, L. et al. 2023. State Policy of Cultural and Art Projects Funding as a Factor in the Stability of State Development in the Conditions of Globalization. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 68(01s): 199-211.

15.Gaman, P. et al. 2022. Institutional Platform to Ensure the Interaction between the Subjects of Combating Medical and Biological Emergencies Mechanism. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 67(04s): 765-775.

16.Gasik, S. 2023. Some insights on the future of project management in public administration. Revista de Gestao e Projetos, 14(3): 27-39.

17.Gavkalova, N.L. et al. 2022. Functioning of United Territorial Communities and Identification of Main Problems of Organizational Support of Local Budget Management. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(43): 107–117.

18.Gladden, E. 2020. A history of public administration. Routledge.

19.Gupta, M. et al. 2021. Application of Fuzzy Logic Data Analysis Method for Business Development. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 194 LNNS. 75–93.

20.Gupta, S.K., Nagar, N., Srivastava, S., Somvanshi, P., Akimova, L. 2024. An Application of Structure Eguation Modelling in Determinants of Customer-Based Brand Eguity (CBBE) in the Banking Area. In: Khouru, R.E., Nasrallah, N. (eds) Intelligent Systems, Business, and Innovation Research. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 489. Springer, Cham.

21.Isaieva, N. et al. 2020. Categorization of personality traumatic experience in chinese womens diary narrative: The framescenario model. Psycholinguistic, 28(2): 56–81.

22.Kalyayev, A. et al. 2019. Global Security Governance: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Imperatives, Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 10-11 April, Spain, Granada, 4484- 4495.

23.Karpa, M. et al. 2021. Entrepreneurship education of the formation of the e-commerce managers professional qualities. Int. J. Entrepreneurship, 25(7).

24.Kassel, D. 2016. Managing Public Sector Projects: A Strategic Framework for Success in an Era of Downsized Government. Routledge.

25.Khomiuk, N. et al. 2020. Planning of socioeconomic development of the territories (experience of European Union). Int. J. Management (IJM), 11(4): 638-646.

26.Klymenko, V.V. et al. 2016. Regional aspects of middle class development in Ukraine. Actual Prob. of Econ., 4(178): 178–188.

27.Kostiukevych, R. et al. 2020. The impact of European integration processes on the investment potential and institutional maturity of rural communities. Econ. and Sociology, 13(3): 46-63.

28.Kryshtanovych, M. et al. 2022. Problems of European integration in the construction of EU security policy in the context of counter-terrorism. Int. J. Safety and Security Engineering, 12(4): 501-506.

29.Kubiniy, N. et al. 2021. Modeling the process of forming the safety potential of engineering enterprises. Int. J. Safety and Security Engineering, 11(3): 223-230.

30.Kulikov, P. et al. 2022. Post-war Economy of Ukraine: Innovation and Investment Development Project. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 67(5): 943–959.

31.Kuzmin, V. et al. 2023. Communicative and Psychological Aspects of Professional Career Development: Exploring 4666 the Differences. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 81: 129-147.

32.Levytska, S. et al. 2022. A Risk-Oriented Approach in the System of Internal Auditing of the Subjects of Financial Monitoring. Int. J. Appl. Econ., Finance and Accounting, 14(2): 194–206.

33.Litvinova, I. et al. 2020. The negative impact of corruption on the economic security of states. Int. J. Manage (IJM), 11(5): 1058-1071.

34.Lola, Y. et al. 2022. Innovative Development of Renewable Energy During The Crisis Period and Its Impact on the Environment. Virtual Econ., 5(1): 65-77.

35.Lopushynskyi, I.P. 2021. Areas of Improvement of Organization and Research of Educational Management Problems. J Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(15): 8–15.

36.Maksymenko, T. et al. 2020. Adaptive management of entrepreneurship model as a component of enterprise resource planning. Academy of Entrepreneurship J., 26(3): 1-8.

37.Mazikana, A. 2023. The Importance of Project Management in Public Sector Delivery. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/Data_Integrity_Notice.cfm?abid=4378471

38.Milakovich, M. 2021. Digital Governance: Applying Advanced Technologies to Improve Public Service. Taylor & Francis.

39.Mishchuk, H. et al. 2020. Impact of the shadow economy on social safety: The experience of Ukraine. Economics and Sociology, 13(2): 289-303.

40.Moutinho, J. and Rabechini, R. 2019. Project management in the public context: research field mapping. Brazilian J Public Administration, 54(5): 1260-1285.

41.Nekvapilova, I. and Pitas, J. 2016. Factors affecting project management in the public sector. International Conference “Knowledge-based organization”, 22(1): 206-214.

42.Novak, A. et al. 2022. Financial and Economic Security in the Field of Financial Markets at the Stage of European Integration. Int. J. Professional Business. Rev., 7(5): e0835.

43.Oliinyk, O. et al. 2021. The impact of migration of highly skilled workers on the country’s competitiveness and economic growth. Montenegrin J. Econ., 17(3): 7-19.

44.Omarov, A. et al. 2022. Features of creative burnout among educational workers in public administration system. Creativity Studies, 15(1): 116-129.

45.Ortina, G. et al. 2023. Economic Efficiency of Public Administration in the Field of Digital Development. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 68(3): 1543-1553.

46.Ortina, G. et al. 2023. Economic Efficiency of Public Administration in the Field of Digital Development. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 68(3): 1543-1553.

47.Panasiuk, I. et al. 2020. Modelling and Simulation of the Thermal Performance of Metal Framed Walls. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory, ATIT 2019 – Proceedings, 309–312.

48.Panasiuk, O. et al. 2021. Virtual Laboratories for Engineering Education. 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ATIT 2021 – Proceedings, pp. 637–641.

49.Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T. and Verschuere, B. 2013. New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-Production. Taylor & Francis.

50.Pulmanis, E. 2014. Public Sector Project Management Application and Sustainability Problems, Case of EU Member State – Latvia. PM World J., 3(11): 1-35.

51.Samset, K. and Volden, G. 2016. Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2): 297-313.

52.Santos, V. and Varajao, J. 2015. PMO as a key ingredient of public sector projects’ success – position paper. Procedia Computer Science, 64: 1190-1199.

53.Shamne, A. et al. 2019. Psychosemantic peculiarities of promotional videos perception. Psycholinguistics., 25(1): 384-408.

54.Shavarskyi, I. et al. 2023. Management of the longwall face advance on the stress-strain state of rock mass (2022) Mining of Mineral Deposits, 16(3): 78-85.

55.Stephens, M., Awamleh, R. and Salem, F. 2022. Agile Government: Emerging Perspectives in Public Management. World Scientific Publishing Company.

56.Troschinsky, V. et al. 2020. International experience of public administration in the area of national security. J. Legal, Ethical and Regulatory. Issues, 23(3).

57.Vigniery, V. 2020. Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: shifts in dominant modes of Public Administration. Perspective On, May 05. https://www.vincenzovignieri.com/old-publicadministration- new-public-management-and-publicgovernance- shifts-in-dominant-modes-of-publicadministration/

58.Volden, G. and Welde, M. 2022. Public project success? Measuring the nuances of success through ex post evaluation. Int. J. Project Management, 40: 703-714.

59.Vorobei, O. et al. 2021. Metaphorical Conceptualization of WAR in Chinese Sports Discourse. Psycholinguistics., 29(2): 25–45.

60.Wernham, B. 2012. Agile Project Management for Government: Leadership skills for implementation of large-scale public sector projects in months, not years. Maitland and Strong.

61.Williams, T. et al. 2019. The front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring. Production Planning & Control, 30(14): 1137-1169.

62.Williams, T. and Samset, K. 2010. Issues in Front-end Decision Making on Projects. Project Management J., 41(2): 38-49.

63.Yermachenko, V. et al. 2023. Theory and Practice of Public Management of Smart Infrastructure in the Conditions of the Digital Society’ Development: Socio-economic Aspects. Econ. Aff. (New Delhi), 68(1): 617-633.

64.Zilinska, A. et al. 2022. Efficiency in the Context of Ensuring Sustainable Territorial Development. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(45): 234–243.

65.Zurga, G. 2018. Project management in the public administration. TPM – Total Project Management Maturity Model. The case of Slovenian public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science, 53: 144-159.